Free Player Retention Guide Get Now
In the hyper-competitive world of mobile games and apps, two growth levers dominate strategic discussions: User Acquisition (UA) and Lifetime Value (LTV) optimization through engagement.
UA ensures your game reaches new users, while LTV improvements make each user more valuable. But these aren’t equal levers. Their impact depends on the size of your player base, the economics of your game, and the costs of implementing improvements.
In this post, we’ll explore why both UA and LTV are essential, how they interact, and what the ROI looks like under two scenarios: a smaller, early-stage game and a large, mature game. Crucially, we’ll introduce a real-world assumption: it takes at least $5,000 per month to fund engagement and LTV initiatives (live ops, events, content, data-driven personalization). This cost floor dramatically shifts which lever is more effective at different stages of growth.
UA is the fuel that powers early growth. By investing in ads, influencers, or partnerships, developers can drive paid installs and increase their daily active users (DAU). Additionally app store placement and ranking could be influenced by the activity volume of users, which UA directly affects.
UA spend is highly measurable. Marketers often use Day 60 Return on Ad Spend (D60 ROAS) as a benchmark. A D60 ROAS of 100% means that within two months, ad costs are fully recouped from the revenue generated by that cohort of users. Other timeframes can also be used, but for the purposes of this blog post, we will limit it to D60.
In this way, UA provides predictable, linear growth: spend $1, get $1 back in 60 days, plus potential long-term upside from retained spenders. A D90 ROAS of 200% indicates that the ROI for UA dollars would be 2x for a 90 day period.
If UA is about filling the funnel, LTV optimization ensures the funnel isn’t leaky. LTV measures the total revenue a user generates over their lifetime. It’s driven by engagement: how often users return, how long they play, and how much they spend.
Ways to increase LTV include:
Even a modest 10% uplift in LTV has an outsized impact—because it compounds across all current and future players.
But here’s the catch: building live ops pipelines, personalization systems, and engagement improvements isn’t free. In practice, most teams must commit at least $5,000/month to these initiatives. This means that LTV optimization only pays off once your DAU is large enough to justify the spend.
Let’s examine two scenarios with this $5,000/month cost floor in place. We’ll compare incremental ROI from (a) spending more on UA, and (b) funding LTV uplift.
Impact of UA:
Impact of LTV Uplift (+10%):
Takeaway:
At this scale, the $5,000/month cost eats up nearly all the gains. UA is the more reliable lever for early-stage games, while LTV uplift is only marginally positive.
Impact of UA:
Impact of LTV Uplift (+10%):
Takeaway:
At large scale, the $5,000 cost becomes negligible compared to the uplift. LTV optimization dominates UA, delivering massive incremental returns.
We can take a different approach to compare the value of UA versus LTV efforts. For UA we can look at how many spenders are obtained, multiplied by the spender lifetime value. For LTV, we would look at the effect of a 10% uplift on the spender's lifetime value.
Takeaway:
Under the $5k/month cost floor, spender-only uplift is not enough at this scale. (This reinforces the earlier conclusion: prioritize UA until DAU grows.)
Takeaway:
At scale, the same 10% LTV lift creates substantial incremental lifetime value from new spenders alone—comfortably clearing the $5k/month cost floor. Also important to note that the LTV uplift efforts probably also increases value from spenders who started playing the game before these LTV uplift efforts started.
The UA vs. LTV debate isn’t about choosing one or the other—it’s about when to emphasize each.
The lesson is clear: UA builds the fire; LTV makes it burn hotter. Your strategy should evolve with your game’s lifecycle, shifting from acquisition-heavy spending early on to engagement-driven optimization once your player base is large enough to justify the fixed costs. At the end of the day, the most successful games are those that know when to lean on UA, when to invest in LTV, and how to balance both to maximize long-term profitability.
Want to customize these calculations for your own games? Contact us and we'll help you figure it out.
For a limited time until September 2025, Sonamine is offering a 60 day money back guarantee to OneSignal customers. Come experience the ease and simplicity of the First Time Spender Nudge package and watch your conversions soar.
For a limited time until September 2025, Sonamine is offering a 60 day money back guarantee to OneSignal customers. Come experience the ease and simplicity of the First Time Spender Nudge package and watch your conversions soar.
